Posts Tagged :

Motion Blur

Photo Commentary #27: Starbursts and Fraunhofer Diffraction 1024 683 varunvisuals

Photo Commentary #27: Starbursts and Fraunhofer Diffraction

Starbursts in Nightime Urban Scene

This gorgeous photo taken by Xerwyn Flores serves as a great example of starbursts in an urban environment. Notice that the lights further back in the photo (and thus less in focus) have weaker starbursts.

One of the most common characteristics you will notice in urban photographs is a lighting phenomenon colloquially known as “starbursts”. This, of course, is in reference to the the star like appearances of lights within an image due to the outward direction of their rays. However, the true explanation of this effect is a little bit more complicated – here goes nothing!

Before I explain the effect in the world of photography, we have to first take a slight detour through the world of physics. The “starburst” effect you notice in many photographs is due to a concept known as the Fraunhofer Diffraction. Fraunhofer Diffraction refers to the phenomenon by which light waves behave when travelling from an infinite distance through a slit or narrow opening. The reason we use infinite as the ideal distance is because it theoretically results in straight parallel light rays which cumulatively create what is known as a plane wave.

Fig 1.) Think of the plane waves as a 3D picture of the "incoming waves" in fig 4. A billion parallel incoming waves theoretically create a "plane". The arrow would point to the slit and screen.
Fig 1.) Think of the plane waves as a 3D picture of the “incoming waves” in fig 4. A billion parallel incoming waves theoretically create a “plane”. The arrow would point to the slit and screen.

In summary:

1.) Infinite distance between light source and slit produces parallel waves.
2.) Parallel waves cumulatively form a plane wave.
3.) All the individual parallel waves within the plane wave enter the slit or aperture at the same phase

Phase Changes and Velocity Measurement. Fig 2.) Phase refers to a point on the light's wavelength
Fig 2.) Phase refers to a point on the light’s wavelength

4.) Fraunhofer Diffraction occurs and light rays meet at a common point (light is focused)

Fig 3.) Light rays diffract and meet at a common point, creating a focused image
Fig 3.) Light rays diffract and meet at a common point, creating a focused image


5.) If light is focused, we can then assume an infinite distance to the light source

Fig 4.) A 2D depiction of parallel light waves entering a slit to create Fraunhofer diffraction. The first figure is a 3D view of the same incoming waves.
Fig 4.) A 2D depiction of parallel light waves entering a slit to create Fraunhofer diffraction. The first figure is a 3D view of the same incoming waves.

When the incoming light wave passes through the slit or opening, some of the rays diffract or bend according to several variables including: size of the hole, shape of the hole, and the distance between the screen, slit, and light source.

Now back to photography. In the beautiful image of the city skyline, we will take a look at the first street lamp on the top right corner – this will be the source of our light. The diaphragm or aperture of the camera lens will be the “slit”, and the light sensor of the camera will be the “screen” (or in other words, the “photo” we see). Let’s start with the light source.

The light source has an impact on the diffraction produced due to its distance from our camera lens as well as its other properties such as wavelength (color) and intensity. We can assume the distance from the lamp to our camera is infinity. Reason being, the street light is in focus. If you look at lights in the background or in the buildings, they have reduced focus, hence less diffraction and weaker starbursts occur.

The aperture of the camera is the slit in the diagram. The narrower the slit or aperture, the more diffraction occurs, and thus, the greater the diffraction. In other words, f/16 would create MORE diffraction than f/11. However, things don’t end there. Another aspect of the aperture is its actual shape – this is where the magic happens.

Fig 5.) As the blades of the camera's shutter increases in number, the more circular the aperture's opening becomes and less diffraction occurs
Fig 5.) As the blades of the camera’s shutter increases in number, the more circular the aperture’s opening becomes and less diffraction occurs

Camera apertures are not perfectly circular. Rather, they are comprised of numerous blades to form various shapes, depending on the number of blades. The more circular the hole, the less the diffraction. This also means, the more the blades in your camera’s aperture, the less diffraction you will see. The shape of your camera’s aperture is also the reason the starbursts get their shape. Fun fact – if your camera has an even number of aperture blades, that will be the number of points in the starbursts you create. If it has an odd number of blades however, the starburst will have twice as many tips. In the main photo, I counted an average of 14 rays in the starburst. This could mean one of two things – the camera has an aperture with either 7 blades, or 14 blades.

Fig 6.) In order to theoretically achieve any Fraunhofer Diffraction, the equation above must be less than one. However, to be seen, the equation must be much smaller than 1. 
W = aperture size
L = Distance from light source to aperture
λ = Wavelength of light
Fig 6.) In order to theoretically achieve any Fraunhofer Diffraction, the equation above must be less than one. However, to be seen, the equation must be much smaller than 1.
W = aperture size
L = Distance from light source to aperture
λ = Wavelength of light


So all in all – if you want an epic starburst, get a camera with 100 aperture blades, get a light source in focus, and make sure it is red in color (red has the longest wavelength)!

Oh and big thanks to Xerwyn Flores for taking this beautiful photo!

Photographer: Xerwyn Flores
https://www.eyeem.com/u/xeriez

Photo Commentary #19: Long Exposure Water Motion Blur 150 150 varunvisuals

Photo Commentary #19: Long Exposure Water Motion Blur

This photo, taken by James Wheeler, is a perfect example of using long exposure photography to achieve a smooth water surface and increase reflections.
This photo, taken by James Wheeler, is a perfect example of using long exposure photography to achieve a smooth water surface and increase reflections.
Throughout numerous of my posts I have touched on the topic of long exposure techniques within photography – today I will continue along this topic.
 
As we know, long exposure techniques can be applied in a variety of circumstances such as astrophotography and timelapses. Another instance is motion smoothing.
 
Two examples of this, from prior posts, are the silky waterfall and moving cloud images. This photo illustrates another scenario by which rough bodies of water are practically transformed into what looks like delicate glass. Just as how a waterfall can be smoothed out, so can waves and ripples. The extended time with which light is allowed to reflect off a subject and into the camera lens causes a blurring effect. In other words, glass-like bodies of water = blurry waves; but obviously the former is a much more elegant description 😉
 
And of course, to connect this with my last post, the “blurry waves” help in accentuating the beautiful reflections that may otherwise be hard to see (similar to how its hard to see your own reflection in a puddle with ripples on the side of a street. Lovely work James!
 
Photographer: James Wheeler
Photo Commentary #14: Color and Vibrancy 683 1024 varunvisuals

Photo Commentary #14: Color and Vibrancy

This beautiful long-exposure of a light trail taken by Benjamin Cruz is a perfect example of using vibrancy in a way that adds enough flare to an image without becoming overwhelming or unrealistic
This beautiful long-exposure of a light trail taken by Benjamin Cruz is a perfect example of using vibrancy in a way that adds enough flare to an image without becoming overwhelming or unrealistic

I think I can speak for all of us when I say that Benjamin Cruz totally nailed this urban photo!

There are simply countless elements in this visual that make it stand out. However the most prominent element is likely the wide range of colors that can be observed in the scene, added by the strength of the vibrance that each hue offers. Vibrance is a term that describes the intensity of only the otherwise muted colors in a scene (versus saturation which refers to ALL the colors in a scene).

Like many other topics we have discussed before, this is a double edged sword. Too much vibrance, and especially saturation, can turn a vivid photo into a messy, blotchy, and otherwise ununatural image. Unfortunately, I found myself to be a perpetrator of this crime numerous times when I began learning photography!

This image avoids such a fate through several avenues. Firstly, the scene itself is colorful. Red tail lights, white lights in office buildings, yellow street lamps, and green signal lights can all attest to this. Secondly, there is contrast between the darkness of the bench and brightness of the intersection – the former accentuates the latter. Thirdly, the utilization of reflections, once again, by the bench.

In summary, a slight increase in the vibrancy of the intersection is magnified several times over by dark reflecting surfaces that simultaneously give the photo contrast, thereby avoiding what could have been an blotchy cartoon.

Great work Ben!

Photographer: Benjamin Cruz
https://www.bencruzphotography.com/
https://www.instagram.com/Thelensoftruth/

Masking in Landscape Photography
Photo Commentary #13: Masking 1024 683 varunvisuals

Photo Commentary #13: Masking

Masking in Landscape Photography
Masking is a highly effective tool in photography, especially in the world of landscapes. This image shot by Johannes Plenio exemplifies a moment where masking can be used to capture the best of two worlds.

At the end of my last post, I asked you to think about how photographers are able to retain areas of sharpness in a long exposure photo – today I will be discussing the answer.

Rather than starting with the solution, I figure it would be more interesting to work towards it. Let’s start with what we know. Imagine you are at the location of where this beautiful photo was taken. Your end goal is to arrive at the same photo. Based on the information I gave in the last post, you are successfully able to capture the rolling clouds in the sky. However, the tree on the right was also swaying in the wind so it is blurry. This applies to the grass as well.

You try to take another picture but with a faster shutter speed. Now the grass and trees are sharp but so are the clouds – once again, not what we want.

So now you have 2 pictures framed with the exact same composition (thanks to your trusty tripod), but neither has both the elements you want – sharp foreground and blurry sky. If only you could take the best parts of each photo and combine them into one…hmm.

Welcome to the process of masking. Masking is one of the most widely used processes in photography. Generally speaking, masking simply refers to covering up a certain portion of a photo to which you do (or do not) want certain characteristics to either be captured and/or edited. In this particular instance, you could utilize both images and via editing software, cover up the sharp clouds in one image and the blurry grass/trees in the other.

Of course, this is not the only time masking can be used!

So, what are your thoughts on masking?

Photographer: Johannes Plenio

http://www.coolfreepix.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jplenio/
https://unsplash.com/@jplenio
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1104990498

Blurred Waterfalls
Photo Commentary #12: Long-Exposure Photography 1024 618 varunvisuals

Photo Commentary #12: Long-Exposure Photography

Taken by photographer Johannes Plenio, this image illustrates the utilization of long exposure photography to capture "blurred" trails of water that we typically see in waterfalls
Taken by photographer Johannes Plenio, this image illustrates the utilization of long exposure photography to capture “blurred” trails of water that we typically see in waterfalls

During my last post, I began to discuss the fantasy-like appearance of waterfalls in certain visuals. This image demonstrates a similar appearance.

So how are these shots achieved? Long-exposure photography. Exposure is a term that refers to the amount of light reaching a camera’s sensor. As you had learned in my astrophotography post, this can be adjusted through changes in ISO, aperture, and shutter speed. “Long” simply acknowledges the extended duration with which light reaches the sensor.

With these facts in mind, it becomes easy to comprehend how photographers can create such an image without having to travel to Narnia. By either reducing the shutter speed or widening the aperture of the lens, not only is more light able to reach the sensor, but the more time movement can be detected.

Each time light bounces off the subject and into the lens, the subject will have moved ever so slightly. This process repeats itself to the point where we have given it a casual term – blur. When you take a photo of your son at a track meet, it’s easy to see blurring in the image because of the quick movement. While it’s not ideal in that scenario, it can be utilized properly in others, such as when shooting waterfalls.

Light strikes each drop of water as it falls, and what you end up seeing is quite literally “blurred water”. However one thing that must be noted is the ISO – if you would like a longer exposure or more “blurring”, the ISO must be reduced. Otherwise, the image could be “blown out” – a way of describing a situation when TOO MUCH light enters the lens. The result is super bright, almost white like, areas in the photo with minimal details visible. The bright portions of a photo (also known as “highlights”) are most susceptible to this effect.

One thing is certain – it’s hard to explain photo flaws when looking at an image as perfect as this! Love the work Johannes!

Oh and here’s something to think about: if the water is blurry in this photo, why are the background elements in the photos (like the trees and grass) sharp? Surely they must have been moving a little bit so why aren’t they blurry as well? More on this in the next post 

Photographer: Johannes Plenio

http://www.coolfreepix.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jplenio/
https://unsplash.com/@jplenio
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1104990498

    My website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to my use of cookies.